Last month, the SEC officially rejected the Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF filed with the Bats BZX Exchange with a 92-page document which explicitly stated that the commission was not satisfied with the dependence of the value of the ETF on public cryptocurrency exchanges.

Specifically, the SEC said that strictly regulated exchanges like Gemini operating in the US market with a proper license are still not resistant to manipulation, and hence, there exists risk involved in basing the base value of a bitcoin ETF on the price listed on exchanges.

“In Section III.B, the Commission addresses BZX’s assertion that bitcoin and bitcoin markets, including the Gemini Exchange, are uniquely resistant to manipulation and finds that the record before the Commission does not support such a conclusion,” the SEC said.

But, the SEC further emphasized that the disapproval of the Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF does not signify the commission’s stance on cryptocurrency or blockchain but simply the lack of a trusted price formation that may leave the ETF and the global Bitcoin market open to price manipulation.

 

The SEC added:

“Although the Commission is disapproving this proposed rule change, the Commission emphasizes that its disapproval does not rest on an evaluation of whether bitcoin or blockchain technology more generally, has utility or value as an innovation or an investment.”

Conclusively, the denial of the Winklevoss ETF mainly pertained to its reliance on Gemini to establish the value of BTC, which the SEC did not approve of.

Recently, Bakkt, a new company designed to bring digital assets to the mainstream created by Microsoft, Starbucks, and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), stated that it is working on building a consistent regulatory construct; transparent, efficient price discovery; and an institutional quality pre- and post-trade infrastructure.

More importantly, Bakkt, which is targeting to serve institutional investors in the US market, said that its exchange will not allow BTC to be traded on margin or leverage, which is the primary reason why the nine ETFs from ProShares and Direxion were rejected this week.

“A critical element to price discovery is physical delivery. Specifically, with our solution, the buying and selling of Bitcoin is fully collateralized or pre-funded. As such, our new daily Bitcoin contract will not be traded on margin, use leverage, or serve to create a paper claim on a real asset,” the Bakkt team said.

 

In the past month, the SEC laid out the following to issues as the main problems of the 10 ETFs that were rejected:

Lack of trusted price formation

Reliance on futures markets and derivatives

The Bakkt exchange satisfies both requirements from the SEC and if Bakkt continues to establish its focus on finding a trusted price formation, it is possible that it could impact the approval of the first bitcoin ETF.

11 votes, average: 3.91 out of 511 votes, average: 3.91 out of 511 votes, average: 3.91 out of 511 votes, average: 3.91 out of 511 votes, average: 3.91 out of 5 (11 votes, average: 3.91 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
(266 total tokens earned)
Loading...

Responses

  1. Rich Reeve

    I wish people would forget about an ETF. The only reason most people want an ETF is because we have been in a 7-8 month bear market and they want to see the price increase ASAP with no thought of the long-term implications. Crypto prices will increase and decrease, reach ATH’s and ATL’s regardless of an ETF.
    People need to remember why cryptocurrency was invented and what we COULD achieve when mass adoption arrives and traditional markets fail. For me, crypto could be even more disruptive than an economic pole shift. It has the potential to turn the internet back into a truly decentralized place of freedom and take the power away from the land grabbing capitalist who filled their pockets with OUR data.
    A potential ETF from the likes of Microsoft, Starbucks, and the New York Stock Exchange is NOT GOOD NEWS in my humble opinion.

    (2)
  2. Pingback: How Bakkt Could Lead to the Approval of the First Bitcoin ETF | CoinFigure

  3. Pingback: How Bakkt Could Lead to the Approval of the First Bitcoin ETF

  4. Pingback: Crypto Daily Roundup - Aug 28, 2018 - Australian Cryptocurrency Enthusiasts - Bitcoin & Ethereum Australia

  5. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] | Bitcown Lowdown – Cryptocurrency News

  6. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] | TheCryptoDB

  7. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] | Coin Crypto News

  8. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News]

  9. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] – Bitcoin Crypto And Blockchain News

  10. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A CHANGE OF GAME FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] - FreeDown

  11. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] – Crypto Hearsay

  12. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] – Tech News Fix

  13. Pingback: WHY BAKKT IS A GAME CHANGER FOR BITCOIN! [Cryptocurrency News] | Cryptocurrency News

  14. Pingback: Bitcoin: Bakkt, towards an upheaval of the cryptocurrency market? | Wizbithunt

  15. Pingback: Bitcoin : Bakkt, vers un bouleversement ... - how earn Bitcoin, skill Bitcoin mining , Ethereum, Litecoin